[llvm-dev] RFC: Strong typedef for LLVM

Jeremy Lakeman via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 5 18:56:50 PDT 2019

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 00:59, David Greene via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> > * Not a fan of the name StrongTypedef (or OpaqueTypedef) either.  If
> > the C++ standard ever acquires related functionality, there will end
> > up being a conceptual mismatch.
> What about "ExplicitWrapper?"  Let's talk more when the patch is posted.
The syntax of using bool's is fine, but the semantics are hard to get
right, so how about SemanticTypedef?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190806/e88e370f/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list