[llvm-dev] Question about thinLTO
Tobias Edler von Koch via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 13 13:34:17 PDT 2017
Just a heads-up: if code size is your main concern, you'll probably see
better results with Regular LTO (if that's possible in your scenario).
ThinLTO's main optimization, for now, is cross-module inlining. While
this is great for performance, it's quite possible that you'll actually
see an increase in code size.
On 07/13/2017 11:38 AM, Christudasan D via llvm-dev wrote:
> I understand the potential risk of having thinLTO in our model now.
> No, we don't support LTO with our custom linker. We are moving to gold
> soon, it is under progress. I hope this feature can be enabled at that
> point of time.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
More information about the llvm-dev