Alfred Perlstein via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 13 00:05:21 PDT 2016
+1, would be nice, that was a LOT of work, of which 80%+ felt
unnecessary. I think LLVM is GREAT and really amazing, however quite
frankly, although I enjoy contributing to open source, this experience
made me more likely to search out projects which a lower bar to entry
and I likely will not bother to contribute fixes unless they were
critical due to this barrier.
On 9/12/16 11:59 PM, Piotr Padlewski wrote:
> This is exactly why we should switch to github. It is much easier for
> new contributors to start with small fixes.
> 2016-09-12 23:43 GMT-07:00 Alfred Perlstein via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>:
> On 9/12/16 11:40 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Alfred Perlstein via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> Hey folks,
> I'm new here, wasn't expecting to subscribe but here I
> am. The reason I'm
> here is that I came across a doc bug, I spent quite a bit
> of time learning
> all the tips and tricks for submitting patches to llvm
> including using
> phabricator and finally tweeting at the llvm account to
> get some attention.
> The patch is here:
> I looked in git and it doesn't look like this was pulled
> in. Has it been
> accepted? If no, did I miss some step?
> Thanks Davide!!
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev