[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?

James Molloy via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 27 10:41:03 PDT 2016


These threads are so active that everyone chiming in with votes would cause
masses of noise. I'm all in favour of a survey, as someone who is very
interested in the outcome but out of my depth discussing the mechanics.

Fwiw, +1 monorepo. We use gerrit downstream and pre commit testing for a
commit that spans clang, LLVM and libc++ is awkward to orchestrate in CI
systems. A single diff on one repo is much nicer.

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:37, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 7/27/2016 12:17 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
> >
> > This is a really bad argument for large influential changes like this.
> Quite the contrary---anybody can participate and anybody can express
> their concerns, explain their goals, their workflow, etc.  For a large
> influential changes like this, "zoning out" is a poor choice of action.
> > I suspect this is why the idea of having a survey or vote has received
> significant support.
> I haven't seen any support for voting or for a survey.  Both are
> strictly worse, as neither provides an interactive forum where the final
> decision is built, instead of selected.
> -Krzysztof
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160727/ed11cc48/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list