[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?
James Molloy via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 27 10:41:03 PDT 2016
These threads are so active that everyone chiming in with votes would cause
masses of noise. I'm all in favour of a survey, as someone who is very
interested in the outcome but out of my depth discussing the mechanics.
Fwiw, +1 monorepo. We use gerrit downstream and pre commit testing for a
commit that spans clang, LLVM and libc++ is awkward to orchestrate in CI
systems. A single diff on one repo is much nicer.
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:37, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 7/27/2016 12:17 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
> > This is a really bad argument for large influential changes like this.
> Quite the contrary---anybody can participate and anybody can express
> their concerns, explain their goals, their workflow, etc. For a large
> influential changes like this, "zoning out" is a poor choice of action.
> > I suspect this is why the idea of having a survey or vote has received
> significant support.
> I haven't seen any support for voting or for a survey. Both are
> strictly worse, as neither provides an interactive forum where the final
> decision is built, instead of selected.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev