[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?

[Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev]

> On 21 July 2016 at 18:12, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote:
> >   llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld, polly, lldb, llgo, compiler-rt,
> > openmp, and parallel-libs.
> 
> I really, *really* would like to see libc++ / abi / unwind. :)
> 
> My reason is that, when building toolchains, the C++ ABI and unwinding
> are fundamental parts of the run-time library, of which RT is only
> part of.

When building *your* toolchain...

My toolchain uses clang but not libc++/abi/unwind, we have our own, and
we don't currently include them in our tree.  We do include compiler-rt.

If we should change our minds later we can opt-in to anything else we
want (libcxx etc, lld? lldb? who knows) but in the meantime they are
unnecessary baggage for my purposes.

--paulr