[llvm-dev] Proposal: virtual constant propagation
Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 2 18:11:32 PST 2016
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > (It also includes the insight that you don't need to store
> > > an inheritance graph or anything like that, just the valid address points
> > > for each vtable).
> > I’m not sure what you mean in this sentence.
> Sorry about that. Hopefully all will become clear once I update the docs.
I have updated docs/BitSets.rst to hopefully give a clearer explanation of
how bitsets can encode C++ type information. Please take a look and let me
know if this makes more sense to you.
It looks like the HTML documentation at llvm.org isn't updating, so you can
read the document at  or just look in the source tree.
More information about the llvm-dev