[llvm-dev] RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 14 07:24:24 PDT 2015
On 14 October 2015 at 14:59, Krzysztof Parzyszek
<kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> This can be done today without any special documents. This relies on the "benevolent
> authority" of the administrators, which is not always granted (although I
> think this list does not suffer from that).
For electronic communications, I agree.
> Another problem with a CoC is that if it puts too much stress on "not
> offending" anyone, some people may avoid voicing certain (legitimate)
> thoughts out of fear of being considered offensive.
My strong reaction to the CoC was originally sparked by that feeling.
I'm sure there are a lot of people like me in this list that feel the
same way and won't voice their concerns. Imposing a strong stance for
the offender *will* marginalise the unintentional offenders. If the
idea of the CoC is to not marginalise anyone, we have to be careful.
As I said earlier, if the intent is to "mediate" not "punish", and the
people mediating it understand this conundrum, we should be fine.
> A conference is a completely different thing, as it is a subject to actual
> law (contract, etc.). A written CoC for a conference would be a good idea,
> and agreeing to it could be a requirement for participation. The difference
> there is that this agreement would be legally binding, and allow for legal
> remedies for violations.
More information about the llvm-dev