[llvm-dev] RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 13 09:35:07 PDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 16:41, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> - *Be welcoming.* We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports
>>> people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not limited
>>> to members of any race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, colour,
>>> immigration status, social and economic class, educational level, sex,
>>> sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, age, size, family
>>> status, political belief, religion
>> How about "religion or lack thereof"? I know it can be understood to
>> be implicit, but as an atheist I tend feel a bit left out of
>> statements like that.
> Well, since we're being picky... :D
> race: last time I checked, we're all members of the same race, homo
> sapiens sapiens.
> national origin vs. immigration status: the former is already covered
> by "culture" for everything that matters, the latter is very specific
> to one culture.
> social "class": this is too Marxist*, we should use "social status",
> since everything is blurred nowadays.
> family status: really?!
> sexual orientation vs. sex vs gender identity and expression: what?!
sexual orientation != sex != gender identity and expression, so
personally, I am in favor of this (though I feel like sex could be
dropped due to the gender identity clause).
> size: really? is this the PC version of "weight"?
> * I don't mean "socialist", nor "communist", but I mean the strict
> division of classes.
> PS: I hope you all understand that I mean no offence. I may have to
> put that as my signature from now on, though, or risk being kicked out
> without notice... :)
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the llvm-dev