[LLVMdev] More code owners needed

[James Molloy]

Hi Tom,

How granular are we going here? Are we looking at owners for each pass, or
not that small?

Cheers,

James

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 at 17:32 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been going through my queue of candidate patches for the 3.6 branch,
> and I think the process could be smoother if we had more code owners.
> So, I'd like to encourage people to nominate themselves or others as
> code owners for any part of LLVM that doesn't already have one.
>
> The responsibilities of a code owner include reviewing patches submitted
> to llvm-commits and approving merge requests to the stable branches.
>
> To get the ball rolling, I'm going to start nominating new code owners
> whenever
> I get a stable merge request for an unowned component.  I'm going to try to
> determine the best code owner based on git history.  If I nominate you,
> there
> is no obligation to accept.  Feel free to decline or nominate someone else.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150420/5e686007/attachment.html>