[LLVMdev] lld coding style

Nick Kledzik kledzik at apple.com
Mon Oct 6 17:00:06 PDT 2014

On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.
> I'm going to create a patch to rename all variables if no one objects.
I object!


> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> would touch all the lines. Diff is not powerful enough to trace the history beyond variable renaming. svn blame would become useless.
> "useless" is much too strong a description.
> If svn blame points to the reformat commit, then simply re-run the blame on the commit before the reformat.
> If total reformats are frequent then this is impractical. If they happen once in five years then it's not really a big deal. Wrapper scripts can even be pretty easily written to do this automatically.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141006/d0771b56/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list