[LLVMdev] Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform

Bill Schmidt wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Nov 4 09:11:08 PST 2014


On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 11:59 -0500, Samuel F Antao wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
> You can find the same issue in the buildbot:
> 
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/16444/steps/compile.llvm.stage2/logs/stdio
> 
> It is failing for me both in BE (gcc 4.8.2) and LE(4.9.1). I am
> compiling with clang 3.5, but those are the gcc toolchains I am using.
> 
> What do you think is the best way to fix this?

I don't know what the best fix is, but clearly a fix or revert is needed
since the patch is breaking some platforms.

Thanks,
Bill

> 
> Thanks!
> Samuel 
> 
> Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 11/04/2014
> 11:45:06 AM:
> 
> > From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM at IBMUS
> > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, beanz at apple.com, Hal Finkel 
> > <hfinkel at anl.gov>, azanella at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > Date: 11/04/2014 11:45 AM
> > Subject: Re: Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform
> > 
> > Hi Samuel,
> > 
> > I haven't encountered this problem.  What gcc/libstdc++ are you
> using?
> > BE or LE?
> > 
> > Copying Adhemerval in case he has heard of any related issues.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> > 
> > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 20:19 -0500, Samuel F Antao wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I observe that r220932 (Removing the static initializer in
> > > ManagedStatic.cpp by using llvm_call_once to initialize the
> > > ManagedStatic mutex.) is causing tablegen to segfault in PPC
> platforms
> > > during static initialization. The crash happens while calling
> > >  std::call_once introduced by this patch in the wrapper used in
> > > getManagedStaticMutex. 
> > > 
> > > I understand this call is buggy for some platforms (or probably
> some
> > > oldish libstdc++ versions). Is this a known issue? Should we guard
> > > LLVM_DEFINE_ONCE_FLAG definition with platform specific macros to
> > > avoid the crash, at least for the moment?
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > > Samuel
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 





More information about the llvm-dev mailing list