[LLVMdev] [lld] Using llvm-mc in lld test suite
simon at atanasyan.com
Fri Jan 10 13:00:54 PST 2014
Thanks for the answer. Ideally, there should be no difference between
Mips integrated assembler and llvm-mc. In fact, as far as I know, the
small difference exists. Some pragmas are implemented in the
integrated assembler and are not implemented in llvm-mc. Fortunately
that does not affect lld testing.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Shankar Easwaran
<shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> We have been converting object files to yaml files and using that as inputs.
> PECOFF uses obj2coff for some of the tests. I think llvm-mc should also
> work, I am not sure if there is a difference in terms of functionality in
> the Mips integrated assembler compared to llvm-mc ?
> Shankar Easwaran
> On 1/10/2014 1:47 AM, Simon Atanasyan wrote:
>> Is it OK to use llvm-mc in the lld test suite?
>> I do not want to maintain assembler, object and test files for small
>> MIPS target related test. Instead of that I prefer to keep a single
>> test file with assembler code and test suite instructions. Is it
>> acceptable way?
More information about the llvm-dev