[LLVMdev] RFC: Improving our DWARF (and ELF) emission testing capabilities
echristo at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 15:15:56 PST 2013
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm fine with this as long as llvm-dwarfdump gets maintained.
> >> >
> >> I agree, and as I said in the original email, in the long term I
> >> believe llvm-dwarfdump is the correct solution.
> > The problem is that if no one is working on testing these sorts of things
> > with llvm-dwarfdump then it won't be maintained for this purpose.
> > See
> > elf-dump and people not expanding/fixing bugs in llvm-objdump and using
> > for tests.
> Can you clarify/elaborate on this last sentence?
Sure. People are updating, modifying and adding new tests that use elf-dump
and not updating, modifying or fixing llvm-objdump to test the same thing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev