[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself

Justin Holewinski justin.holewinski at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 11:18:11 PST 2013

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:

> >>
> >>  I do not think you can legally make clang a system compiler on
> >> Windows without licensing headers/libraries from Microsoft.
> >> So inability to parse all of the SDK headers is a non issue to me,
> >> can't use them anyway.
> >
> >
> > Care to cite a source?
> Please don't (either of you) randomly speculate on the legality of
> clang/LLVM.
> To be perfectly blunt (without trying to actually be offensive):
> You aren't qualified, and it's not helpful or productive.

It's not speculation, it's asking for references to information.  If there
was interpretation, then I would agree.  But there is not.



Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130110/060c9751/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list