[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions

Dmitri Gribenko gribozavr at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 14:14:20 PDT 2012

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Martinez, Javier E
<javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote:
> From the responses it’s pretty clear that the preference is to avoid using C
> string functions altogether. I’ve attached at list of calls in Clang/LLVM.
> The EASY/MEDIUM/DIFFICULT tag is an estimate of the effort to replace the
> call based on the location of the source buffer. If there are no objections
> I’ll prepare a patch that replaces the string manipulation functions an
> appropriate  string object.

Thank you for the list.  Fixed the Clang non-platform specific bits in
r164554.  Didn't dare to fix other occurrences in Clang because they
are #ifdefed for Windows and I don't have a Windows machine to test.


(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list