[LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?

[Bill Wendling]

Hi Pawel,

Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.).

-bw

On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:

> Tobi,
>   It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be
> one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release?
>         Jack
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev