[LLVMdev] Automating Analysis Pass at linktime question [liblto] [safecode]

[John Criswell]

On 11/8/12 2:28 PM, Henry Abbey wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a research assistant at the University of Wisconsin 

I'm originally from Wisconsin.  Go Bucky!

> and we're trying to come up with a general way to run our whole 
> program analysis over programs that may use different methods to 
> perform the build.  I saw some discussion that liblto could be used 
> for this (and safecode successfully did it) for llvm 2.6 - 3.0, but 
> that doesn't seem to be working the same way with llvm 3.1+.

We're successfully using libLTO with SAFECode mainline which is now 
tracking LLVM mainline.  What platform are you on, and what problems are 
you having?  Is the issue that the linker isn't running libLTO at all, 
or is the problem that the linker is not loading your modified version 
of libLTO?


>   Is it still possible to install our pass into liblto directly 
> anymore?  Is there perhaps a better way to have the linker intercept 
> and run our analysis not using liblto?

I don't know of anything better than libLTO.

-- John T.

>
> Thanks,
> --Henry Abbey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121110/74b4f017/attachment.html>