mcrosier at apple.com
Mon Nov 14 18:08:40 PST 2011
I see the cause for confusion. Your message from this morning was specifically referring to this assert:
Assertion `ExtVNI == VNI && "Unexpected existing value number"' failed.
That assertion was fixed in the r144547. The PR shows this assert:
Assertion failed: (isMetadata() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor"), function
Bisect fails until the beginning of time (or really r125140), so I'm not sure where to go with this now. If an outstanding issue still exists I'm hopeful something with show up with tonight's nightly tests.
On Nov 14, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Chad Rosier wrote:
> In that case I'll see if I can't bisect.
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Chad Rosier wrote:
>>> I believe this has been fixed with llvm r144547. See: <rdar://problem/10441389>.
>> It is likely that r144546 fixed some other bug. I just checked, this still fails with r144602.
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev