[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.

Karel Gardas karel.gardas at centrum.cz
Fri Jul 8 08:31:18 PDT 2011

On 07/ 8/11 05:26 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Karel Gardas<karel.gardas at centrum.cz>  wrote:
>> On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
>>> revision when it started failing.  (We have an ARM buildbot at
>>> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
>>> but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.)
>> I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back to
>> Freescale and my pandaboard is testing GHC performance so I'll not be able
>> to get to this again earlier than next week.
>> Anyway, JIT failures happens somewhere between 131458 (which is OK) and
>> 131466 (where JIT tests fail). Let me know if this is enough or I shall
>> continue to point to the culprit revision directly.
> Given that revision range, the only remotely likely culprit is 131463.
>   Which basically means that it "broke" because the default target
> features changed.

Pandaboard's finished testing a little bit sooner so it's now on 
tracking job again. 131462 was OK, now testing 131464...


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list