[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.

Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com
Fri Jul 8 08:26:57 PDT 2011

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
>> revision when it started failing.  (We have an ARM buildbot at
>> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
>> but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.)
> I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back to
> Freescale and my pandaboard is testing GHC performance so I'll not be able
> to get to this again earlier than next week.
> Anyway, JIT failures happens somewhere between 131458 (which is OK) and
> 131466 (where JIT tests fail). Let me know if this is enough or I shall
> continue to point to the culprit revision directly.

Given that revision range, the only remotely likely culprit is 131463.
 Which basically means that it "broke" because the default target
features changed.

I'll going to try and debug this.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list