[LLVMdev] Licensing requirements
dg at cowlark.com
Wed Jul 6 16:13:15 PDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/07/11 20:47, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote:
> I really agree with the intentions, it would be nice for user-compiled
> programs not to unwittingly include code that imposes licensing
It's pretty narsty, but including the text of the license in a data
segment that gets automatically linked into the final program will
satisfy the letter of the license text --- after all, it doesn't say it
has to be *readable*.
My reading of the MIT license is that it requires binary attribution,
too --- it doesn't distinguish between source and binary and therefore
applies to both. But I'd very much like to be wrong.
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│ "I have a mind like a steel trap. It's rusty and full of dead mice."
│ --- Anonymous, on rasfc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the llvm-dev