[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
dalej at apple.com
Fri Jan 22 15:52:35 PST 2010
On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:20 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote:
> Hi Dale,
> Thanks for replying. Concerning Darwin, I compiled this test on snow
> leopard and ran it using rosetta (that is, using –arch ppc –m32). I
> will try this later on leopard.
Yes, it passed sometimes for me too. I no longer have the exact
results, but there was no correlation with compiler or target.
> From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:10 PM
> To: Jose Rangel
> Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote:
>> 2) The following test is commented out on purpose:
>> Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most
>> lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In
>> addition, it seems to work for us. Is there something wrong with
>> this test (e.g. buggy test?). Or is (or was) llvm buggy when
>> running this test?
> I looked at this at one point; it got very inconsistent failures in
> several different Darwin environments, both ppc and x86, both gcc
> and llvm-gcc. It looked like a memory error of some kind, wild
> load or store somewhere, use-after-free, something like that. It
> was not I who disabled it but my data led me to agree with that
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev