[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging

David Greene dag at cray.com
Fri Jan 15 11:31:34 PST 2010

On Friday 15 January 2010 13:16, Dan Gohman wrote:

> Is it ever desirable to pass false to the "limit" argument?

Not in the usual course of things but I figured someday someone
might want to dig deeper.  "limit" is just a heuristic and it
could be wrong.  Maybe the SelectionDAG is really just huge.

> Otherwise this looks ok.

I'll check it in and if we think "limit" should go away, I'll
follow up with another patch.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list