[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding

Paul Davey plmdvy at gmail.com
Sat Feb 6 19:30:11 PST 2010

to me the name implies that it creates a handle to the type given, i guess
if you look at it in context of the ocaml conversion functions some people
may think otherwise.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote:

> everyone--
> I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type
> handle from a type, rather than vice versa as its name would imply.  Should
> I send a patch to change the name of the function to reflect its type
> better, or should I just lump it?
>> j h woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org>
> http://jhw.vox.com/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100207/5cd94cfd/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list