[LLVMdev] Changes in FunctionPassManager constructor

[Christophe de Dinechin]

Salut David,


On 3 févr. 2010, at 18:39, David Vandevoorde wrote:
> It avoids having to deal with backward compatibility cruft?

You can do that without presenting a self-rewriting web-site as your "tutorial", can't you?

> 
> It's a pain for client code, but I suspect that for the long-term quality of the code base it's a useful decision.


I have nothing against fixing LLVM. I have something against being unable to do any kind of regression testing because I need to massively change the test along with the library. That can't really help quality.


Thanks,
Christophe