[LLVMdev] Changes in FunctionPassManager constructor

David Vandevoorde daveed at vandevoorde.com
Wed Feb 3 09:39:02 PST 2010

On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:

> On 3 févr. 2010, at 17:54, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christophe de Dinechin
>> <christophe at taodyne.com> wrote:
>>> What guarantees does LLVM try to provide regarding source code compatibility?
>> None.
> And this is a good thing because... ?

It avoids having to deal with backward compatibility cruft?

It's a pain for client code, but I suspect that for the long-term quality of the code base it's a useful decision.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list