[LLVMdev] Changes in FunctionPassManager constructor
daveed at vandevoorde.com
Wed Feb 3 09:39:02 PST 2010
On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> On 3 févr. 2010, at 17:54, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christophe de Dinechin
>> <christophe at taodyne.com> wrote:
>>> What guarantees does LLVM try to provide regarding source code compatibility?
> And this is a good thing because... ?
It avoids having to deal with backward compatibility cruft?
It's a pain for client code, but I suspect that for the long-term quality of the code base it's a useful decision.
More information about the llvm-dev