[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
clattner at apple.com
Wed Sep 9 08:50:38 PDT 2009
On Sep 8, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>>> This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
>>> Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a
>>> bit and its not causing a regression.
>> No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6. Devang, can you
>> please prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the
>> 2.6 branch?
> hmmm... r81058 fixes a bug in the code that I added as part of
> r79742. We definitely do not want to add r79742 in 2.6. Are we sure
> that 4879 is not a recent regression ?
Ok, if 2.6 is not affected, then we definitely don't want to mess with
More information about the llvm-dev