[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
dpatel at apple.com
Tue Sep 8 15:01:52 PDT 2009
On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>> This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
>> Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit
>> and its not causing a regression.
> No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6. Devang, can you please
> prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the 2.6
hmmm... r81058 fixes a bug in the code that I added as part of r79742.
We definitely do not want to add r79742 in 2.6. Are we sure that 4879
is not a recent regression ?
More information about the llvm-dev