[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879

[Devang Patel]

On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:

>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>> This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html
>>
>> Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit  
>> and its not causing a regression.
>
> No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6.  Devang, can you please  
> prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the 2.6  
> branch?
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html

hmmm... r81058 fixes a bug in the code that I added as part of r79742.  
We definitely do not want to add r79742 in 2.6. Are we sure that 4879  
is not a recent regression ?

-
Devang