[LLVMdev] Validation Criteria
dag at cray.com
Thu Nov 20 15:14:14 PST 2008
As we begin designing the proposed validation process, we should think about
what the criteria for a successful validation should be.
In the initial proposal I suggested the "make check" on llvm should pass as
should the tests in llvm-test.
According to Tanya, not all of llvm-test passes. Do we have a sense of how
far away from a full passing llvm-test we are?
I also know that a lot of work has gone into making the llvm-gcc DejaGNU tests
pass. Where are we in that process?
Initially, I'll throw out the idea that if llvm passes its internal tests
("make check") and successfully bootstraps llvm-gcc-4.2 we can consider the
validation successful. Does that sound like a reasonable starting point? The
assumption here is that as regressions in other tests (llvm-test, SPEC, etc.)
are found, testcases will be submitted to the llvm testsuite.
Once llvm-test passes, we can add it to the list of required tests to pass.
Ditto llvm-gcc-4.2's tests and anything else we might want to add.
Note that as tests get added to existing testsuites, we'll require the new
tests to pass as well. So once llvm-test is added to the validation
criteria, anything added to llvm-test after that will also have to pass in
order for a validation to succeed. I don't want to get into the business of
tracking individual test regressions, XFAIL'ing things that run outside
DejaGNU, etc. It's a lot of extra work for not much gain, IMHO.
Would anyone want to add other criteria?
More information about the llvm-dev