[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
evan.cheng at apple.com
Wed Jan 30 18:51:04 PST 2008
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:53 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 16:22, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>> I was thinking along the same lines. But does this work for the
>>> cases where
>>> IP is _not_ end()? Is it true that we always want to look one back
>>> from IP?
>> I think so. That's the intention and it's safe because IP != begin().
> Right. But doesn't that imply we've had some messed up intervals
> created for quite some time, even onces where IP was _not_ end()?
> How the
> heck did this ever work? :-/
This routine is rarely called. I am surprised the bug hasn't surfaced
before. But that's how it is...
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev