[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug

David Greene dag at cray.com
Wed Jan 30 15:53:38 PST 2008

On Wednesday 30 January 2008 16:22, Evan Cheng wrote:

> > I was thinking along the same lines.  But does this work for the
> > cases where
> > IP is _not_ end()?  Is it true that we always want to look one back
> > from IP?
> I think so. That's the intention and it's safe because IP != begin().

Right.  But doesn't that imply we've had some messed up intervals being 
created for quite some time, even onces where IP was _not_ end()?  How the 
heck did this ever work?  :-/


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list