[LLVMdev] Possible LiveInterval Bug
dag at cray.com
Wed Jan 30 15:53:38 PST 2008
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 16:22, Evan Cheng wrote:
> > I was thinking along the same lines. But does this work for the
> > cases where
> > IP is _not_ end()? Is it true that we always want to look one back
> > from IP?
> I think so. That's the intention and it's safe because IP != begin().
Right. But doesn't that imply we've had some messed up intervals being
created for quite some time, even onces where IP was _not_ end()? How the
heck did this ever work? :-/
More information about the llvm-dev