[LLVMdev] Unwinds gone missing

[Matt Giuca]

Jon Harrop wrote:
> 
> Is it? I was just reading the documentation about LLVM's exception
> handling 
> and it sounded ideal for my needs. How much of it does not work as the
> docs 
> imply?
> 

Jon, I ran into this issue in September and re-ignited this discussion in
another thread, here:
http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html
http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html 

I too had been quite excited by reading the documentation. Unfortunately, it
seems "unwind" does nothing at all - it compiles into a no-op. So you have
to use the lower-level functions in libgcc. I've never figured out how to
get it working, sorry. But there may be helpful information in that thread.

Matt
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-gone-missing-tp21087203p21175147.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.