[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
baldrick at free.fr
Mon Aug 11 09:53:13 PDT 2008
> So you agree that nothing on that offending link line is
> really requiring g++?
it does require g++ in order to get the standard C++ libraries.
> ...I don't see why the linkage of the gfortran
> compiler itself should have anything to do with c++ code.
Because the llvm parts of gcc are written in C++. Not to
mention llvm itself!
> Not even
> FSF gcc trunk has switched over to building with c++ yet. I assume
> that's also not the case with the llvm gcc 4.2 front end.
Parts of llvm-gcc are written in C++.
More information about the llvm-dev