[LLVMdev] Virtual methods (was: LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder)
jo at durchholz.org
Fri Apr 4 15:42:30 PDT 2008
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 13:06 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> >> Please verify that this actually happens in practice with llvm-gcc and
> >> gcc.
> > If that's already the case (which I'll gladly believe), where does the
> > performance overhead for virtual functions come from?
> > (Just curious.)
> I don't understand what you're asking. Please rephrase.
Rephrased answer going to Jonathan's post.
More information about the llvm-dev