[LLVMdev] Virtual methods (was: LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder)

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Fri Apr 4 13:06:03 PDT 2008

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>> Please verify that this actually happens in practice with llvm-gcc and
>> gcc.
> If that's already the case (which I'll gladly believe), where does the
> performance overhead for virtual functions come from?
> (Just curious.)

I don't understand what you're asking.  Please rephrase.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list