[LLVMdev] Are 'make check' failures of interest in llvm-gcc?

[Török Edwin]

Dale Johannesen wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>   
> Could be either.  I'm running this suite and seeing a lot more  
> failures than
> you're reporting;
I didn't wait for all the tests to finish, just seen that there are many...

>  many builtin optimizations are not done, many expected
> warnings do not match gcc syntax, etc.  There are also some real bugs,
> but all the ones I know of are related to rarely used features,  
> mostly gcc
> extensions.
>
> It would be more useful to do this in 4.2 IMO.
>   
Ok.

--Edwin