[LLVMdev] ocaml binding question

[Gordon Henriksen]

On Dec 12, 2007, at 08:16, Jon Harrop wrote:

> On Monday 10 December 2007 23:52, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>
>> On 2007-12-10, at 18:28, Jon Harrop wrote:
>>
>>> Incidentally, should more OCaml stuff beyond the bindings be part  
>>> of LLVM or would it be better to fork them into a separate project
>>
>> Can you be more specific than "stuff"?
>
> I'm thinking of a library that compiles an AST represented by an  
> OCaml data structure into the appropriate calls to LLVM. Ultimately,  
> with support for exceptions and a run-time.

Since that ASTs are by definition language-specific, such should  
probably be a separate project because LLVM itself is language-agnostic.

— Gordon