[LLVMdev] Nightly Test Machine Identification

Jim Laskey jlaskey at apple.com
Wed Oct 18 11:45:42 PDT 2006

That's an easy fix.  However, I do need to merge data (correctly)  
based on the change.  So it will take 3 or 4 wags.


-- Jim

On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:
>> I had upgraded my Linux kernel from 2.6.17 to 2.6.18. I suggested  
>> to Jim
>> that changes in the minor revision number of the operating system  
>> should
>> not count as a new machine. He said he'd look into it when he has  
>> time.
>> Its not a huge issue, I just didn't want to be incrementing the  
>> machine
>> numbers needlessly and needed to know what it was based on.
> Ok, seems reasonable.  The nightly tester script probably shouldn't  
> be in
> the business of trying to grok OS version #'s.  Maybe OS version #
> shouldn't be included at all.
> -Chris
> -- 
> http://nondot.org/sabre/
> http://llvm.org/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061018/5b653b13/attachment.bin>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list