[LLVMdev] Virtual "components" for llvm-config

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Thu Mar 23 22:37:25 PST 2006


On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eric Kidd wrote:
>> I'd have to derive the actual set of required libraries, but I'm lacking
>> motivation for that task right now.
>
> OK, here's my current minimalist proposal:
>
>  backend: Either a native backend or a C backend.
>  engine: Enough libs to run ExecutionEngine using either a JIT or 
> interpreter.
>  all: All LLVM libraries.
>
> Please feel free to suggest better names. :-)

Instead of 'engine', how about "jit" and "interpreter".  Of course I'd 
think that "jit+interpreter" would also work (or something).

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list