[LLVMdev] RFC: better method names

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Fri Apr 28 09:52:27 PDT 2006

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Andrew Lenharth wrote:

> So, after some discussion here, it became clear that at least one method
> has a very poor name.  Attached is a patch that should clear up this
> confusion.  Some comments and enum values obviously would need to be
> updated.

haha, :)



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list