[PATCH] D85691: lld: link libatomic if needed for Timer

[Joerg Sonnenberger via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

joerg added a comment.

This issue is on my long term TODO list. If there are no 64bit atomics, it is a really stupid idea to use them for timekeeping. I think for the use case of Timer, just splitting it into second and subsecond with explicit overflow handling is perfectly reasonable and does not affect the correctness of the normal use as the aggregates are only accessed on completion?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D85691/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D85691