[PATCH] D31898: Introduce libLTO C APIs to target the "resolution-based" new LTO API

[Steven Wu via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

steven_wu added a comment.

Some high level comments before I look into details. Are we expecting those two APIs to co-exist? Maybe just create a new libLTO and replacing the existing one in few releases? Maybe libLTO.1.dylib and libLTO.2.dylib, with a cmake configuration for which one to symlink to?

Really like the idea of `llvm-liblto`. It would be even better if we have an easy way to run `llvm-lto`/`llvm-lto2` and `llvm-liblto` on the same tests and make sure it pass on both side.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D31898/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D31898