[PATCH] D54780: [llvm-demangle-fuzzer] Also fuzz microsoftDemangle().

[Nico Weber via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

thakis added a comment.

> I would probably prefer always calling microsoftDemangle() in llvm-demangler-fuzzer. The Itanium demanglers are identical, so we're just wasting cycles fuzzing them both independently.

That makes sense to me (with a comment explaining this).


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54780/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54780