[PATCH] D53245: Teach the DominatorTree fallback to recalculation when applying updates to speedup JT (PR37929)

[Jakub Kuderski via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

kuhar added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53245#1265481, @NutshellySima wrote:

> Do you think for the unittests of the incremental updater, the updater should directly apply updates on a small `k` (don't do recalculation with few updates) or `n` (don't do recalculation on a small graph)?


I think that for small `n` it shouldn't  recalculate when `k < n`.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D53245