[PATCH] D38295: Do not use posix_fallocate because it's slow.

[Sean Silva via llvm-commits]

On Sep 28, 2017 8:45 PM, "Rui Ueyama via Phabricator via llvm-commits" <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

ruiu abandoned this revision.
ruiu added a comment.

Thank you for reviewing. But I think my test environment was not set up
correctly. While it is an ext4, fallocate(2) returned an error. After
mkfs'ing the partition, fallocate(2) started working, and the original code
worked as fast as with this patch. So it seems there's no point to submit
this patch. I'll withdraw it.


Does disk encryption affect it?

-- Sean Silva



https://reviews.llvm.org/D38295



_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170928/aca12dc9/attachment.html>