[PATCH] D38295: Do not use posix_fallocate because it's slow.

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017 8:45 PM, "Rui Ueyama via Phabricator via llvm-commits" <
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> ruiu abandoned this revision.
> ruiu added a comment.
>
> Thank you for reviewing. But I think my test environment was not set up
> correctly. While it is an ext4, fallocate(2) returned an error. After
> mkfs'ing the partition, fallocate(2) started working, and the original code
> worked as fast as with this patch. So it seems there's no point to submit
> this patch. I'll withdraw it.
>
>
> Does disk encryption affect it?
>

I can't verify as I've already reinitialized the filesystem, but I doubt
it, because that was a new SSD drive, and I formatted it myself.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170928/34d0585e/attachment.html>