Jonas Paulsson via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 18 23:21:55 PST 2017
> This is a little confusing, but I wouldn't call it a bug. We
> consistently call CustomLowerNode with the illegal type, whether it's
> the result or an operand, and existing targets depend on that.
Aha - that's a bit confusing, but thanks for explaining! I think a
comment on this would be useful -- see my attached proposal for it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 745 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the llvm-commits