[PATCH] D28368: Give higher full-unroll boosting when the loop iteration is small.

Michael Zolotukhin via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 17 14:46:54 PST 2017

mzolotukhin added a comment.

I agree with the plan proposed by Eli.

One thing I'm not 100% certain is "Rename -unroll-threshold to -unroll-full-threshold": I think we can keep '-unroll-threshold' for full unroll threshold and add '-unroll-partial-threshold' for the partial unrolling case. It might be better because all current uses of '-unroll-threshold' option will remain correct. But I don't feel strong about it, so whatever name you choose is fine with me.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list