Don't invent names for STT_SECTION symbols.

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits]

On 12 March 2016 at 12:33, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
>> We should just copy the symbol names with -r.
>> ...
>>-        // That can happen if creating relocatable output.
>>-        if (Sym.getType() == STT_SECTION)
>>-          SymName = Section->getSectionName();
>
> Why not ?

Because we don't need to. If the producer wants to give a section
symbol a name, it can do it and we will keep it. If whatever produced
the .o decided to not name it, it is not the linker's job to change
that decision.

Cheers,
Rafael