[PATCH] D16201: [ELF/AArch64] - Implemented set of R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_* relocations.

Adhemerval Zanella via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 26 13:59:24 PST 2016


zatrazz added a comment.

I am also not sure about the position of the TLSDESC relocation, I will check that.

I also noted that the patches does not create dynamic R_AARCH64_TLSDESC relocations against local symbols. For instance:

  __thread int v1;
  static __thread int v2;
  
  // We don't use these pointers, but putting them in tests alignment on
  // a 64-bit target.
  __thread char* p1;
  char dummy;
  __thread char* p2 = &dummy;
  
  __thread int v3 = 3;
  static __thread int v4 = 4;
  __thread int v5;
  static __thread int v6;
  
  int*
  f() {
    return &v2;
  }



  clang++ -target aarch64-linux-gnu -fpic test.cc -c -o test.o
  clang++ -target aarch64-linux-gnu -fpic test.o -shared -o test.so
  Improper alignment for relocation R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_LD64_LO12_NC
  clang-3.9: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)

It is due the fact is passing the wrong value on relocateOne (...). Also to avoid extra bogus dynamic relocations with recent changes in trunk I am using:

  diff --git a/ELF/Target.cpp b/ELF/Target.cpp
  index dbe0cc5..fef5b60 100644
  --- a/ELF/Target.cpp
  +++ b/ELF/Target.cpp
  @@ -1220,11 +1220,14 @@ AArch64TargetInfo::AArch64TargetInfo() {
   }
   
   bool AArch64TargetInfo::isRelRelative(uint32_t Type) const {
  -  return Type == R_AARCH64_PREL32 || Type == R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 ||
  -         Type == R_AARCH64_LDST8_ABS_LO12_NC ||
  -         Type == R_AARCH64_LDST32_ABS_LO12_NC ||
  -         Type == R_AARCH64_LDST64_ABS_LO12_NC ||
  -         Type == R_AARCH64_ADD_ABS_LO12_NC || Type == R_AARCH64_CALL26;
  +  switch (Type) {
  +  default:
  +    return true;
  +  case R_AARCH64_ABS64:
  +  case R_AARCH64_ADR_GOT_PAGE:
  +  case R_AARCH64_LD64_GOT_LO12_NC:
  +    return !Config->Shared;
  +  }
   }

Which I intend to create a patch to simplify the logic on dynamic relocation creation.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16201





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list